They Were Your Most Promising… Until They Went Quiet
- Stephen McConnell

- Apr 17
- 2 min read

You didn’t hire them because they were average. You saw the edge, the promise, the spark—something in them told you: they’re going to lead here one day.
Then slowly… they went quiet.
No outburst. No resignation letter. Just less input. Less voice. Less visibility. They started checking boxes but stopped challenging the status quo. The fire you once saw in them flickered out—and you may not even remember when it happened.
This is the most dangerous form of disengagement: unspoken disconnection from purpose. They’re still present. Still professional. But internally, they’ve already clocked out.
And if you’re reading this thinking of someone… it’s probably not too late yet.
Here’s the thing no one tells you about future leaders: They don’t always burn out visibly. They fade out quietly.
At the executive level, it’s easy to assume that silence means satisfaction. After all, the squeaky wheels usually get the oil. But your quiet talent? They’re not squeaking—they’re slipping away under the radar.
They may have been your most vocal contributor once. They may have driven initiatives, challenged outdated systems, brought fresh energy. But now?
They sit on the call. They nod. They deliver. But they’re no longer leading.
So the real question becomes:
➡️ When did they lose clarity?
➡️ Where did the vision stop feeling like theirs?
➡️ Why are they still showing up but no longer showing up?
➡️ What expectations did they abandon internally, even if they’re still meeting yours externally?
Because CEOs don’t just lose people to competitors. They lose them to confusion. And confusion is the enemy of leadership.
The best performers require clarity—not control.
If you’re not engaging them in meaningful conversations about their future, they’ll quietly start writing a resignation letter in their mind. It won’t be about salary. It won’t even be about workload. It will be about meaning. It always is.
Here’s the twist: Sometimes the most disengaged people aren’t the underperformers. They’re the overachievers who never got space to lead their way.
And as they pull back, you’ll see symptoms that look like:
• Fewer questions • Shorter emails • Less creative input • More “safe” decisions • Avoidance of leadership conversations • No pushback, no vision-casting, no ownership
They’re not being difficult. They’ve simply lost belief that their contribution shapes the future of the organization.
And that’s on leadership—not theirs. Yours.
So ask yourself:
🧠 “What message have I accidentally sent that told them their ideas don’t matter here?”
🧠 “What meeting did they stop speaking up in, and why?”
🧠 “What feedback did they take personally because I wasn’t present enough to guide them through it?”
🧠 “What part of our culture has made silence more rewarding than engagement?”
If this feels heavy—it should. Because the future of your leadership pipeline depends not on who you hire next… …but on who you keep connected now.
When was the last time you pulled that person aside and simply asked: “What do you want your legacy to be here?”
You don’t need a retention strategy. You need a reconnection strategy.
And if you’re not having these conversations—someone else eventually will.


Comments